MARCH 11 – As recently as a few weeks ago, I was very gloomy about the global economy, bearish about stock markets and deeply depressed about the world in general. I believed there was a 50 per cent chance that the world was facing a long cycle of recession, depression and wealth destruction.
I maintained that the bears believe that the best-case economic scenario is Japan’s agony since the 1990s, and the worst is a replay of the 1930s.
Recent events haven’t brightened the picture. The global economic outlook has deteriorated – the market consensus is now that the angle of descent of not only the US economy, but Europe and the major emerging markets, has steepened.
And even more disconcertingly, President Obama has announced what many investors consider to be a populist redistributionist tax agenda, which increases the tax rate on capital gains and dividends and gives tax reductions and distributions to the middle class and the poor.
Neither event has buoyed investor mood, as witnessed by last week’s stock-market declines.
Despite this, I still believe that there is a 50 per cent probability of a happier outcome. The world is having the most severe recession of the post-war era, and the recovery will be sluggish and plagued by inflation.
Nevertheless, the doomsday scenario of depression and deflation, of the Dow Jones industrial average hitting 5000 and the S&P 500 hitting 500, is farfetched. In fact, markets could be on the brink of a major rally, and the US economy may begin to recover later this year. Here are the reasons why:
1. Powerful medicine. The financial panic and the collapse of the world economy caught the so-called Authorities (i.e., the central banks and the governments of the world) by surprise. They reacted slowly, but nevertheless far faster than the Authorities in the US in the 1930s or Japan in the 1990s.
In both cases, the Authorities were not only tardy, but also made serious policy errors, such as raising tax rates, imposing tariffs and not curing the banking systems. These mistakes are now well understood – the current Fed chairman has written a book on the subject.
This time around – and this is very important – the Authorities have unleashed powerful fiscal and monetary stimuli that are totally unprecedented in size and scope. Interest rates have been dramatically cut everywhere, and every week more countries announce new fiscal-stimulus programs. It takes time for these actions to affect economic activity.
Rate cuts and expansion of the money supply are powerful medicine, but won’t make a difference for at least a year. Fiscal programs are quicker, but also take time to implement.
The actions of the Authorities should begin to boost activity by the late spring, and their uplifting effect will grow as the year progresses. In the United States, the fiscal-stimulus program is expected to add 4 percentage points to real GDP growth in both the second and third quarters of this year.
In other words, the world economy should begin to level out and improve as time goes on. We are not in a hopeless death spiral as the bears say.
2. Markets already assume the worst. World stock markets have been falling since 2000 and, adjusted for inflation, are down 60 to 70 per cent. The sorry state of the world economy is front-page news.
Therefore, it stands to reason that the bad news is extremely well known and must be pretty thoroughly priced into the markets. Treasury bonds have vastly outperformed stocks for 10 years, and the relationship between the two is back to the level of the early 1980s, which was a fabulous buying opportunity for stocks; recall that 1982 was the takeoff point for the greatest bull market in history.
Bear in mind that for the entire 20th century, a turbulent 100 years, the annual real (after inflation) return for stocks in the US was 6.9 per cent, versus 1.8 per cent for Treasury bonds.
In Sweden the relevant figures were 8.2 per cent per year versus 2.3 per cent for bonds; in Germany, 3.7 per cent versus minus 2.3 per cent; and in Japan, 5 per cent versus 1.6 per cent.
Why would you want to be a lender to the US government rather than an owner of real assets or the means of production at a moment when the government is printing more paper than at any time in its history? Rolling more money off the printing presses always eventually means higher inflation and interest rates, which is of course bad for bonds.
3. Stocks are on sale. Depending on your frame of reference, stocks are either cheap or very cheap, in absolute terms as well as versus inflation and interest rates.
In America, the price-to-earnings ratio of the S&P 500 when it is calculated on a market-capitalisation-weighted basis is about nine times already depressed earnings. At the height of the bubble in 2000 that ratio was close to 20 times, and at the peak of the recovery in the fall of 2007, it was around 15.
In addition, the dividend yield on stocks in both the US and Europe is higher than that on government bonds.
Over the long run, the ratio of a company’s stock price to its book value (a measure of the retained earnings of a company), and the ratio of its stock price to sales, have been the best predictors of performance, and they show exceptional value at the moment. Buy low, sell high!
4. Pessimism is pervasive. Sentiment is just incredibly depressed. I have never seen anything like it, not even in 1974 when the outlook was very grim indeed. Back then, America had just lost a war in Vietnam and nearly impeached a president, it was suffering hyperinflation and a recession, and its cities were on fire.
Still, the gloom wasn’t at the levels that we are seeing today. Money-market cash is equivalent to 43 per cent of the total capitalisation of US stocks, an all-time high. The return on cash is zero! Hedge funds hold more cash than ever before. Private-equity funds are literally being given away because their owners don’t want the risk. All of it shows how bearish everyone is.
Over 40 years, my experience has been that when everyone is bearish, it’s invariably right to be gradually buying. Being a contrarian works. The bottom of a stock-market cycle, by definition, has to be the point of maximum bearishness. The news doesn’t have to be good for prices to rally; it just has to be less bad than what has already been factored into the market.
Already there are some glimmers of hope. In the oil-consuming countries, the huge drop in oil prices is similar to a massive tax cut. The fall in consumption is beginning to level out. Inventories have been reduced to levels so low that production will have to be increased even to meet the current depressed level of demand.
The Japanese car companies have announced assembly-line increases, and in the United States, auto-dealer and home-builder surveys have looked up. Last week, the purchasing-managers index (PMI) in China rose for the third consecutive month. JPMorgan’s global-manufacturing PMI posted a second consecutive gain in February, and its new-orders index has turned and is rising.
These indexes are still in recession territory, but the rate of change has turned up. US house prices are still falling, and mortgage foreclosures are rising.
However, the affordability of housing has soared and existing home sales are rising. The Obama administration is proposing major mortgage-term restructuring.
The final antidote to despair was captured by Bernard Baruch in his 1932 foreword to a reprint of Charles Mackay’s classic book “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds.”
“If in the lamentable era of New Economics that preceded the crash of 1929, primitive investors had only chanted to themselves ‘two plus two still equals four,’ then the disaster might have been averted,” wrote Baruch.
Similarly, he said, amid the gloom that had descended by 1932, “when many begin to wonder if declines would never halt, the appropriate abracadabra may be: ‘They always did’.” And they always will. – Newsweek
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Monday, March 9, 2009
World Bank says global economy will shrink in 2009
Published: Monday March 9, 2009 MYT 7:45:00 AM
NEW YORK: The World Bank said Sunday that the global economy will shrink this year for the first time since World War II and that the global financial crisis will make it tougher for poor and developing nations to access needed financing.
Trade is forecast to fall to its lowest point in 80 years in 2009, as economic hardship ripples across the globe, the bank said.
The most drastic trade slowdowns are expected in East Asia, where growth had been robust, the bank said in a paper prepared for a meeting of finance ministers and central bank officials next week.
The impact on the poorest countries will be severe, the bank said, predicting that a group of 129 countries face a shortfall of $270 to $700 billion this year.
The bank, which offers low-interest loans and grants to developing nations, warned international financial institutions will not be able to cover even the low end of that estimate.
Only one-quarter of those vulnerable countries will be able to ease the economic downturn through job creation or "safety net" programs, the bank said.
The ramifications of the growing financial crisis on the world's poorest nations will likely remain for some time, the bank said.
Because richer nations are borrowing more, developing nations are being squeezed out and many financial organizations that have provided financing to lower-income countries "have virtually disappeared."
Developing countries that are still able to get credit will face higher borrowing costs and lower cash flow which will lead to weaker investment and slower growth, the bank said.
To ease the burden on developing nations, the bank urged cooperation from developed nations, global institutions and the private sector.
"We need to react in real time to a growing crisis that is hurting people in developing countries," World Bank Group President Robert B. Zoellick said.
"This global crisis needs a global solution and preventing an economic catastrophe in developing countries is important for global efforts to overcome this crisis. We need investments in safety nets, infrastructure, and small and medium size companies to create jobs and to avoid social and political unrest."
Developed countries should spend some of their billions in stimulus funds in poorer nations to ease the burden on those countries, World Bank Chief Economist and Senior Vice President Justin Yifu Lin said.
"Clearly, fiscal resources do have to be injected in rich countries that are at the epicenter of the crisis, but channeling infrastructure investment to the developing world where it can release bottlenecks to growth and quickly restore demand can have an even bigger bang for the buck and should be a key element to recovery," Lin said.
ฉ 1995-2009 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)
NEW YORK: The World Bank said Sunday that the global economy will shrink this year for the first time since World War II and that the global financial crisis will make it tougher for poor and developing nations to access needed financing.
Trade is forecast to fall to its lowest point in 80 years in 2009, as economic hardship ripples across the globe, the bank said.
The most drastic trade slowdowns are expected in East Asia, where growth had been robust, the bank said in a paper prepared for a meeting of finance ministers and central bank officials next week.
The impact on the poorest countries will be severe, the bank said, predicting that a group of 129 countries face a shortfall of $270 to $700 billion this year.
The bank, which offers low-interest loans and grants to developing nations, warned international financial institutions will not be able to cover even the low end of that estimate.
Only one-quarter of those vulnerable countries will be able to ease the economic downturn through job creation or "safety net" programs, the bank said.
The ramifications of the growing financial crisis on the world's poorest nations will likely remain for some time, the bank said.
Because richer nations are borrowing more, developing nations are being squeezed out and many financial organizations that have provided financing to lower-income countries "have virtually disappeared."
Developing countries that are still able to get credit will face higher borrowing costs and lower cash flow which will lead to weaker investment and slower growth, the bank said.
To ease the burden on developing nations, the bank urged cooperation from developed nations, global institutions and the private sector.
"We need to react in real time to a growing crisis that is hurting people in developing countries," World Bank Group President Robert B. Zoellick said.
"This global crisis needs a global solution and preventing an economic catastrophe in developing countries is important for global efforts to overcome this crisis. We need investments in safety nets, infrastructure, and small and medium size companies to create jobs and to avoid social and political unrest."
Developed countries should spend some of their billions in stimulus funds in poorer nations to ease the burden on those countries, World Bank Chief Economist and Senior Vice President Justin Yifu Lin said.
"Clearly, fiscal resources do have to be injected in rich countries that are at the epicenter of the crisis, but channeling infrastructure investment to the developing world where it can release bottlenecks to growth and quickly restore demand can have an even bigger bang for the buck and should be a key element to recovery," Lin said.
ฉ 1995-2009 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Malaysia may face full-blown recession
Wednesday March 4, 2009
By K.C LAW
KUALA LUMPUR: There is a 50% chance Malaysia will fall into a “full-blown” recession this year, said Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER) executive director Prof Datuk Mohamed Ariff Abdul Kareem.
“Technical recession is almost certain. The 1.3% (real gross domestic product (GDP) forecast in January) is considered optimistic. In fact, I think the best-case scenario will be 0.5% growth this year.
“We forecast the first half year will have negative growth but hopefully the second half will show some positive figure, which will give us 0.5% growth,” he said, adding that MIER would review again the GDP as a lot of development has taken place since the last forecast. Speaking after a seminar organised by Rahim & Co, Ariff said Malaysia’s economy might remain sluggish for a long time.
“My fear is that we may be stuck there for sometime. Contraction may not be sharp but long,” he said, adding that it could take three years (2012) before the local economy returned to normalcy.
He expected the fiscal deficit to increase to more than 6% of GDP if the second stimulus package was RM30bil, which is about 4% of GDP. Financing the deficit budget was not a problem as there was a lot of liquidity in the local financial market, which funds 93% of the government deficit.
However, he said it was “not about how much you spend, it is how you spend that matters.”
“It is about confidence and confidence depends on transparency. People want to know where the money comes from and where it’s going. Unfortunately, transparency is low in Malaysia.
“A fiscal package may only cushion impact but cannot neutralise it. But without any stimulus package, it will be worse,” he said. Meanwhile, Ariff projected the ringgit would take at least four years to reach 2.8 against the US dollar, a level which he considered equilibrium.
He said the greenback continued to be artificially strong now because central banks worldwide were continuing to fund the US deficit, and thus increasing the demand for the dollar.
In the meantime, the ringgit would remain weak and volatile, but unlikely to cross 3.8 against the dollar, Ariff said.
ฉ 1995-2009 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)
By K.C LAW
KUALA LUMPUR: There is a 50% chance Malaysia will fall into a “full-blown” recession this year, said Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER) executive director Prof Datuk Mohamed Ariff Abdul Kareem.
“Technical recession is almost certain. The 1.3% (real gross domestic product (GDP) forecast in January) is considered optimistic. In fact, I think the best-case scenario will be 0.5% growth this year.
“We forecast the first half year will have negative growth but hopefully the second half will show some positive figure, which will give us 0.5% growth,” he said, adding that MIER would review again the GDP as a lot of development has taken place since the last forecast. Speaking after a seminar organised by Rahim & Co, Ariff said Malaysia’s economy might remain sluggish for a long time.
“My fear is that we may be stuck there for sometime. Contraction may not be sharp but long,” he said, adding that it could take three years (2012) before the local economy returned to normalcy.
He expected the fiscal deficit to increase to more than 6% of GDP if the second stimulus package was RM30bil, which is about 4% of GDP. Financing the deficit budget was not a problem as there was a lot of liquidity in the local financial market, which funds 93% of the government deficit.
However, he said it was “not about how much you spend, it is how you spend that matters.”
“It is about confidence and confidence depends on transparency. People want to know where the money comes from and where it’s going. Unfortunately, transparency is low in Malaysia.
“A fiscal package may only cushion impact but cannot neutralise it. But without any stimulus package, it will be worse,” he said. Meanwhile, Ariff projected the ringgit would take at least four years to reach 2.8 against the US dollar, a level which he considered equilibrium.
He said the greenback continued to be artificially strong now because central banks worldwide were continuing to fund the US deficit, and thus increasing the demand for the dollar.
In the meantime, the ringgit would remain weak and volatile, but unlikely to cross 3.8 against the dollar, Ariff said.
ฉ 1995-2009 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
